Descriptions of language use tend to be absolute and uncompromising in their nature. For instance, it’s common to hear that certain ways of speaking or writing (i.e., expressing oneself) are “wrong” or “ungrammatical”, “inappropriate”, or even “unprofessional”. In other words, that there is correct (“good”) language and incorrect (“bad”) language, where the former is how we should strive to express ourselves.
However, what tends to get lost in translation is that “standard” language, just like “non-standard” speech, is nothing other than a linguistic variety. Both standard and non-standard dialects are logical, systematic, and rule-abiding. Sometimes, their rules may coincide, while other times they may be separate and apart.
Importantly, a prime distinguishing feature is that standard language users tend to hold more social power, authority, and prestige, while non-standard language users often form part of marginalized or minoritized communities. Put differently, standard dialects are prestige dialects, whereas non-standard varieties are stigmatized.
In this seminar, students will explore various language dialects (both standard and non-standard) with the objective of developing a more in-depth understanding of the relationship between language use and personal identity. Not only will we examine views on “right” and “wrong” language, but also how these views influence how we perceive others, as a result of internalized, socio-cultural biases. Who gets to decide what’s “right” or “wrong” anyway? Put differently, “If you understand me, why correct me?”
Some familiarity with Spanish, while not required, will benefit students in their understanding of course concepts.
- Teacher: Faulkner Tris